🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold action to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and parents are monitoring intently to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of states are exploring comparable restrictions.

• The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the PM stating that mobile devices and apps are "robbing our children's youth". A law is expected to be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to protect children from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to confirm the user details of social media users. Authorities have indicated that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential options under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has asked parliament to enact a proposal increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has urged families to restrict their children from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a non-binding motion supporting a ban for minors unless a parent decides otherwise is given. Although it warns of the "compulsive" nature of these services, the resolution does not enact binding law.

"An effective age limit is a solid foundation," commented a leading European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

In the UK, the administration has kept open a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is discarded" but insisting any decision must be "grounded in conclusive evidence".

Last year, support grew behind a proposal to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end weakened. However, the government vowed to further research the matter.

Charities have voiced warnings. A prominent charity established by the relatives of a teenager who died after viewing harmful platform posts contends that a blanket age ban might not protect children and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when users turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to create tools that are safe and fit for children," said a leading online safety campaigner.

America: A Decentralized Approach

Across America, action is mostly unfolding at the regional government level due to national stalemate.

• Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a law prohibiting those below 14 from accessing social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a rule restricting minors to a single hour of social media use per day, with additional use needing parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced measures requiring adult authorization for under-16s to open social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from some individuals to follow the Australian example, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Beyond Europe and the US, further states are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

But, global bodies adopt a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has advised that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could prove counterproductive". The body points out that social networks can be a "vital connection" for isolated youth and that bans should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

While this international debate continues, the policies of Australia and its followers show that governments internationally are no longer content to delay for platforms to act voluntarily.